How can we help you today?

Go ahead and ask us anything.

I want to find a proper device to measure 5G Extreme High Frequencies

Avatar
  • updated
  • Answered

I have been suggested to buy the HF-ANALYSER HF38B.

I am not an expert in this sort of devices but it is mention that the top peak read the this analyser can measure is 2.7Ghz while the standard 5G Broadband expected in my town is 26Ghz which it makes it 10 times higher.


Can anyone please advise a suitable device for 5G Frequencies measurement.


Kind regards

Alejandro

Pinned replies
Avatar
Shaun A Kranish Principal
  • Answer

It looks like 5G is rolling out and utilizing a wide range of frequencies.  Some of those frequencies are 12 Ghz and below.  For this we are recommending the Safe and Sound Pro 2 Meter.

Another good alternative to that meter would be the Acoustimeter AM10.  However, the AM10 does not have as wide of a frequency range.  Its specs only go up to 8 Ghz whereare the Safe and Sound Pro 2 goes up to 12 Ghz.

Neither of these meters will cover *all* 5G (5th Generation - not to be confused with 5Ghz - 5G does NOT stand for gigahertz) frequencies.  They will cover some, and likely be able to show you when 5G is present.  But these meters may not be able to actually measure all of the frequencies emitted by 5G antenna systems.

Avatar
DaisyWhite

When I do a google search for "what is the highest frequency of 5g", the top answer says "current 5G communications include frequencies below 30 GHz, such as the 28-GHz band, and frequencies up to about 100 GHz as the upper limit". Sooo... what are we measuring 5g with these days? Any updates on maybe cheaper meters out there?

Avatar

hello are there any updates on (cheaper) meters capable of detecting 5g up to 60 ghz or 39ghz? thank you

Avatar
Jim Ireland
Quote from Justin Fearell

It sounds like I have no idea what the frequency will be?  I just explained that in detail.  It sounds like you have a problem with basic reading comprehension.  Go read it again.  They will use many frequencies and most of them will be under 6 Ghz.  I never claimed that not using 5G would protect anyone from EMF radiation which is another topic altogether.  EMF radiation is emitted from every electronic device we use.  If you don't use 5G with your phone you won't be sending these higher frequencies to your ear constantly.  That's some fairly basic common sense for you to not understand.  So it's a terrible attitude to protect ourselves?  What in the...?  "Our only option is to not have Wi-fi?"  When did I say that?  Well, current routers already use 5G frequencies of 5Ghz and 2.4 Ghz.   Anyone who has a    WI-FI router in their home has already been constantly exposing themselves for years to the same frequencies that 5G will use.  Bluetooth also uses 2.45 Ghz which is the same as a microwave oven.  If you shield your home from radiation those materials are often reflective so if you still use a router it will just bounce the signals around in your home and make the problem worse.  The other option is to use a router guard which lowers RF radiation below safe levels but then you can't shield your home with anything reflective.  They do have materials that absorb rather than reflect though.  Why are you against anti-radiation or faraday clothing?  You do know that these materials can block 90-98% of RF Radiation don't you?  Why wouldn't you use them?   For someone who is so scared of 5G that seems like an odd thing to say.  I'm not sure what your fixation on 60 Ghz is about, but they are not using frequencies that high through antennas.  I already explained that the higher frequencies will be only be used for close proximity device to device transfers and those will be more like 80 Ghz anyway.  So what do you think a 60 Ghz meter will do for you?  The devices will literally have to be right next to each other and your meter would have to be between them to even be in the path.  You would also have to be between the devices to be exposed.  If you don't use 5G it won't even be an issue for you.  It sounds like you have some misconceptions about 5G and your lacking some basic information and understanding. You'll need to educate yourself before you can even begin to have an intelligent conversation about it.  Hey, I'm with you that 5G should be banned.  If you think you can stop them then more power to you.  I'll cheer you on but I'm not holding my breath, and in the meanwhile I'm going to take the practical approach and protect myself and my family, and you should too. 

Thats a fine intelligent answer and to the point, you sound like you have a thorough knowledge on this, very detailed and relevent answers which I'm feeling very grateful for, I have an interest in this area to self protect and share with those willing to listen for past two years (electrical background ) ).

I am also delighted with this great website by SHAUN A. KRANISH I think hes a well informed expert in his own field and a decent guy to boot, keep up the Brilliant Work, THANK YOU BOTH.

Avatar
SEGMENTS
Quote from 409

I also agree that with a newer 5G capable phone with the right app we should be able to have a nice 5G meter. I don't believe the cell phones run on the 60 gigahertz millimeter wave. I too am waiting for an inexpensive meter to come out for this range. 

you need to remember  they won't shoot themselves and their business by allowing anything to compromise  or jeopardize  it.why would they allow an application that shows their business is harmful to humans.... I once became aware of this 30 years ago.people in a small community became SICK and  their kids had a sorts of health problems and they lived near or in close proximity  to those electricity towers. Obviously technology was on the cusp of booming.you know government depth keep FOOD & health info confidential to themselves. 

Avatar
Justin Fearell

No one was saying telecom companies are using 60 ghz for standard 5G signals. Someone was asking about some military weapons testing or something.  We've already established that 39 ghz is the highest we know of.  That's what Verizon in Minneapolis is using.  Every company is different and it varies from one market to another.  Most companies are using frequencies lower than 6 ghz.  However, I have read that they will use higher frequencies for direct device to device uploads.  This really isn't a risk because the signal does not travel farther than a few millimeters.  You are thinking backwards about the risks associated with different frequencies though.  Lower frequencies are not more dangerous because they pass through things.  That makes them less dangerous.  If a signal passes though your body, as all non-ionising radiation supposedly does, then it does not have an opportunity to affect your cells.  It passes right through.  It is the higher frequencies that do not pass through our bodies that are more dangerous.  They will interact with your cells and cause damage.  700 mhz signals are about as safe as it gets.  A frequency that low could never damage any cells in our bodies.  Millimeter waves on the other hand, don't pass through much of anything.  Maybe it can't pass through a wall and get to a person inside, but it also can't pass through your body, so when you are exposed it will damage cells.  The eyes, skin, and male gonads are the most susceptible.  

Avatar
Jacob Kline
Quote from free world

Rod, after 21 years of tracking these killers, I believe there's no question I

cannot answer .... ask the oracle,  just try me.  

Okay here's one: do you have a website I could go to to read your research?

Or here's a simple one, what the heck do we do?


Avatar
-1
Sharon Noble
Some of the comments are not correct as far as I know.  For example the 60 GHz is not in use now and most of the telecoms admit that it is unlikely that these will be used for a long time for things like phones. Right now 5G is using lower frequencies e.g. 700 MHz which are far more dangerous than the milliwaves (another incorrect statement). These penetrate more easily into the buildings as well as our bodies.

Sharon
Avatar
Nora

Justin, you were talking about router guards. I'm freakin out with our new ATT router at home. With work from home we needed WIFI, it was unavoidable. We bought the taller, big router guard. Do you think this really work? I was reading the thread because I want to find a meter to test it, but I really don't know which one to get!

Avatar
-1
Nora
Quote from Justin Fearell

Has anyone heard of a frequency higher than 39 Ghz being designated for standard 5G use anywhere?   Every city is different for how the frequencies are being divided up among carriers.  

Justin, you were talking about router guards. I'm freakin out with our new ATT router at home. With work from home we needed WIFI, it was unavoidable. We bought the taller, big router guard. Do you think this really work? I was reading the thread because I want to find a meter to test it, but I really don't know which one to get!

Avatar
Curt
Quote from Theocrat

The best option is to move as far out into the country as possible but if not, I recommend at least a EMF blocking bed canopy for when you sleep, these block most frequencies including 60GHz but everything blocks 60GHz, just don't get any 60GHz routers for inside the home. Other wireless frequencies cause blood coagulation because of the pearling effect it has on the blood among other problems. One problem with 5G is they install more 4G transmitters along with the 5G which causes densification of the blood coagulating frequencies. Also, start increasing your vitamin C, Zinc and Iodine for it's protection against all forms of radiation. I know a gentleman on your side of the pond, Mark Steele that is fighting this insanity, you might look him up. God bless, and I hope you and your mum can live free from these frequency weapons.

Yeah was looking at the canopies, do they actually work? My mum doesn't have a router at her little bungalow so stumped. I'm thinking it could be feedback from the pylons or maybe the military out in the water checking for migrants. 

I've heard stuff about people picking up the sonar on land who are close by. Would make sense too with all these whales washing up on shore these days. 

never thought I'd be a conspiracy theorist believer.