Go ahead and ask us anything.
I have been suggested to buy the HF-ANALYSER HF38B.
I am not an expert in this sort of devices but it is mention that the top peak read the this analyser can measure is 2.7Ghz while the standard 5G Broadband expected in my town is 26Ghz which it makes it 10 times higher.
Can anyone please advise a suitable device for 5G Frequencies measurement.
Kind regards
Alejandro
Rod, after 21 years of tracking these killers, I believe there's no question I
cannot answer .... ask the oracle, just try me.
Okay here's one: do you have a website I could go to to read your research?
Or here's a simple one, what the heck do we do?
No one was saying telecom companies are using 60 ghz for standard 5G signals. Someone was asking about some military weapons testing or something. We've already established that 39 ghz is the highest we know of. That's what Verizon in Minneapolis is using. Every company is different and it varies from one market to another. Most companies are using frequencies lower than 6 ghz. However, I have read that they will use higher frequencies for direct device to device uploads. This really isn't a risk because the signal does not travel farther than a few millimeters. You are thinking backwards about the risks associated with different frequencies though. Lower frequencies are not more dangerous because they pass through things. That makes them less dangerous. If a signal passes though your body, as all non-ionising radiation supposedly does, then it does not have an opportunity to affect your cells. It passes right through. It is the higher frequencies that do not pass through our bodies that are more dangerous. They will interact with your cells and cause damage. 700 mhz signals are about as safe as it gets. A frequency that low could never damage any cells in our bodies. Millimeter waves on the other hand, don't pass through much of anything. Maybe it can't pass through a wall and get to a person inside, but it also can't pass through your body, so when you are exposed it will damage cells. The eyes, skin, and male gonads are the most susceptible.
I also agree that with a newer 5G capable phone with the right app we should be able to have a nice 5G meter. I don't believe the cell phones run on the 60 gigahertz millimeter wave. I too am waiting for an inexpensive meter to come out for this range.
you need to remember they won't shoot themselves and their business by allowing anything to compromise or jeopardize it.why would they allow an application that shows their business is harmful to humans.... I once became aware of this 30 years ago.people in a small community became SICK and their kids had a sorts of health problems and they lived near or in close proximity to those electricity towers. Obviously technology was on the cusp of booming.you know government depth keep FOOD & health info confidential to themselves.
It sounds like I have no idea what the frequency will be? I just explained that in detail. It sounds like you have a problem with basic reading comprehension. Go read it again. They will use many frequencies and most of them will be under 6 Ghz. I never claimed that not using 5G would protect anyone from EMF radiation which is another topic altogether. EMF radiation is emitted from every electronic device we use. If you don't use 5G with your phone you won't be sending these higher frequencies to your ear constantly. That's some fairly basic common sense for you to not understand. So it's a terrible attitude to protect ourselves? What in the...? "Our only option is to not have Wi-fi?" When did I say that? Well, current routers already use 5G frequencies of 5Ghz and 2.4 Ghz. Anyone who has a WI-FI router in their home has already been constantly exposing themselves for years to the same frequencies that 5G will use. Bluetooth also uses 2.45 Ghz which is the same as a microwave oven. If you shield your home from radiation those materials are often reflective so if you still use a router it will just bounce the signals around in your home and make the problem worse. The other option is to use a router guard which lowers RF radiation below safe levels but then you can't shield your home with anything reflective. They do have materials that absorb rather than reflect though. Why are you against anti-radiation or faraday clothing? You do know that these materials can block 90-98% of RF Radiation don't you? Why wouldn't you use them? For someone who is so scared of 5G that seems like an odd thing to say. I'm not sure what your fixation on 60 Ghz is about, but they are not using frequencies that high through antennas. I already explained that the higher frequencies will be only be used for close proximity device to device transfers and those will be more like 80 Ghz anyway. So what do you think a 60 Ghz meter will do for you? The devices will literally have to be right next to each other and your meter would have to be between them to even be in the path. You would also have to be between the devices to be exposed. If you don't use 5G it won't even be an issue for you. It sounds like you have some misconceptions about 5G and your lacking some basic information and understanding. You'll need to educate yourself before you can even begin to have an intelligent conversation about it. Hey, I'm with you that 5G should be banned. If you think you can stop them then more power to you. I'll cheer you on but I'm not holding my breath, and in the meanwhile I'm going to take the practical approach and protect myself and my family, and you should too.
Thats a fine intelligent answer and to the point, you sound like you have a thorough knowledge on this, very detailed and relevent answers which I'm feeling very grateful for, I have an interest in this area to self protect and share with those willing to listen for past two years (electrical background ) ).
I am also delighted with this great website by SHAUN A. KRANISH I think hes a well informed expert in his own field and a decent guy to boot, keep up the Brilliant Work, THANK YOU BOTH.
hello are there any updates on (cheaper) meters capable of detecting 5g up to 60 ghz or 39ghz? thank you
When I do a google search for "what is the highest frequency of 5g", the top answer says "current 5G communications include frequencies below 30 GHz, such as the 28-GHz band, and frequencies up to about 100 GHz as the upper limit". Sooo... what are we measuring 5g with these days? Any updates on maybe cheaper meters out there?
It looks like 5G is rolling out and utilizing a wide range of frequencies. Some of those frequencies are 12 Ghz and below. For this we are recommending the Safe and Sound Pro 2 Meter.
Another good alternative to that meter would be the Acoustimeter AM10. However, the AM10 does not have as wide of a frequency range. Its specs only go up to 8 Ghz whereare the Safe and Sound Pro 2 goes up to 12 Ghz.
Neither of these meters will cover *all* 5G (5th Generation - not to be confused with 5Ghz - 5G does NOT stand for gigahertz) frequencies. They will cover some, and likely be able to show you when 5G is present. But these meters may not be able to actually measure all of the frequencies emitted by 5G antenna systems.